Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:10:10 UTC

A.2.8.PER:2 - Problem

How can FPF represent positive permission without turning it into an obligation modality, absence-of-evidence claim, permit document, gate result, readiness label, capability, or performed action?

A conforming account must make weak and strong permission different, keep grant occurrence identity inspectable, connect only eligible matching work to a current grant, keep both exercise and non-exercise from establishing a frame-relative non-violation finding, and expose same-scope normative conflicts instead of resolving them by display or wording.