Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:05:11 UTC

A.2.8:10 - Consequences

Benefits

  • Generic policy content and actual duty no longer collapse.
  • Actual bearers are directly recoverable.
  • Modality, scope, referents, and validity remain lintable.
  • Assignment and responsibility independence is explicit.
  • Assurance can be added proportionately without becoming universal process overhead.

Costs and mitigations

  • A positive individual-duty claim needs more than a policy sentence. This is the necessary cost of claiming a world-side relation; generic policy content remains cheap to state.
  • Domains with another instituting basis need the pattern that defines that basis. Until then, return the exact missing-governor result.
  • Conflict resolution remains outside this pattern. Preserve each current commitment plus the exact source, independently obtaining authority relation, and selecting rule required by the named conflict or choice use; apply D.3/D.4 for an interlevel ethical conflict, C.11 for an explicit choice among available options, or return missing-governor[commitment conflict resolution] when no direct result rule exists.