fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 7538–7547

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:50:20 UTC

A.2.8:12 - SoTA-Echoing

Informative. These comparisons motivate the distinctions; they do not govern local claims.

  • BCP 14 (RFC 2119 and RFC 8174). Controlled normative keywords support explicit modality, but keywords do not identify an individual bearer or institute a duty. Adapt.
  • W3C ODRL 2.2. Duties, permissions, assignees, actions, constraints, and policy provenance motivate explicit participants and qualifiers. FPF keeps individual commitment, permission, policy episteme, and evidence separate. Adapt.
  • Institutional and constitutive-rule approaches. Their distinction between rule content, institutional conditions, and resulting relations supports the required constitutive rule and actual basis. Adopt the separation.
  • Policy-as-code practice. Admission predicates and policy evaluation should not be confused with individual obligation or performed Work. Adapt.
  • Trace-based compliance and supply-chain attestations. Evidence and carriers can support adjudication while remaining distinct from relation obtaining. Adopt.