A.2.8:4.6 - Direct Neighboring Relations
| Current question | Direct result | Unsupported inference |
|---|---|---|
| What does a generic policy prescribe? | one normative claim episteme and its applicable rule content | an individual duty from generic content alone |
| Which System holds a local system-role assignment? | one A.2.1 assignment occurrence and its declared species | a duty or responsibility |
| Did a communicative act occur? | one A.2.9 U.SpeechAct Work occurrence | its institutional effect without the constitutive rule |
| Is the bearer responsible? | one admitted domain responsibility predicate and occurrence; otherwise the exact missing governor | responsibility from duty, assignment, position, or “owner” wording |
| Is an action permitted or authorized? | the exact A.2.8.PER grant, exercise, non-prohibition, non-violation, or conflict result | permission from commitment or assignment |
| Did access occur? | an exact domain access relation; otherwise missing-governor | access from permission, duty, or assignment |
| Did the bearer perform Work? | recover the exact actual performer through A.13 and let A.15.1 independently admit one dated U.Work; add F.6 only when this duty account or its receiving use expressly consumes precise assignment-bound attribution through the same obtaining A.13 assignment | Work or attribution from the duty alone |
| Was the duty satisfied or violated? | a separately governed evaluation or compliance result using actual Work and evidence | compliance from publication or record completeness |
| What resulted? | the separately identified result and its direct result relation, or A.15.PROD for production and inception | a generic result relation from duty or Work |
The common corpus has no universal responsibility predicate. VP.AllocationResponsibility can help a reader recognize the concern; the applicable domain responsibility predicate determines whether the relation obtains.