fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 8253–8267

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:20:09 UTC

A.2.9:12 — Relations

Uses / builds on

  • Uses A.13 and A.15.1 (U.Work) for the independent actual-occurrence backbone: exact actual performer System; local agential kind and criterion; classification; obtaining assignment, scope, working situation, and window; adequate core evidence and only a conditionally consumed profile; grounded communicative history; enacted U.Method; temporal extent; and at least one obtaining locally declared containing-System relation. Uses F.6 only afterward for a precise performedUnderAssignment claim through the same obtaining assignment. Uses a separate optional methodDescriptionRef only when the receiving claim needs that episteme.
  • Uses A.7 for the strict actual-act≠record/description≠carrier split.
  • Coordinates with A.2.6 for scope/window discipline.
  • F.18 can serve as a lexical entry point for naming U.SpeechAct and “utterance” in the promise/utterance/commitment triad.

Used by

  • A.2.8 (U.Commitment) when an exact policy treats the speech act as the required instituting basis and the direct commitment predicate independently holds, and A.2.8.PER when a GrantedPermissionRelation@Context independently obtains with this act as institutingSpeechActRef.
  • A.2.5 (assignment-state predicates and their Work-admission use) when the selected state predicate or direct consumer requires an authorization or approval act.
  • A.6.C for unpacking promise, approval, guarantee, and agreement-like boundary wording while preventing episteme-as-agent claims and preserving provenance.