Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:05:11 UTC

A.22.CGUS:4.1.1 - Conditions through constituent and encompassing work

When a continuation is a way of performing work, recover the constituent–whole relations in the relevant Method and Work structures that can change availability. Ask what constituent actions must be performable and what encompassing work is being done through them. B.1.5.EW supplies that recovery; knowing a Method’s description does not supply the capability or resources to perform it.

Distinguish conditions needed at entry, conditions that must remain satisfied during combined performance, and the result required by the encompassing use. In particular:

  • a constituent may be individually performable but fail in the needed coordination;
  • adequate local resources may be insufficient when constituents share them;
  • a constituent result may satisfy its own postcondition while leaving the whole’s result unresolved.

For each relevant condition, state what it concerns and how it affects this continuation. Reuse an understood connection or adequate existing basis. A missing condition blocks or leaves unknown the dependent alternative; it need not block an independent way to learn, obtain support or change the arrangement. Capability belongs to its performer and conditions under A.2.2; prospective resources and support remain prospective until available.

In the formal branch, express these dependencies with the existing constituents, selected relations, applied constraints and continuation judgements. A temporal edge alone cannot express that one action constitutes part of another ongoing work. Nor does a nested flow position establish Method or Work parthood. A diagram may show the relations together when their meanings remain recoverable.

A constituent’s postcondition supports the encompassing conclusion only through the relevant composition and result-use conditions. An expected postcondition is not an observed result. If the displayed account omits conditions needed to perform the whole, state the narrower question it answers. A constituent hierarchy without potential alternatives does not require CGUS qualification.