fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 38422–38434

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:50:08 UTC

A.22.CGUS:4.3 - Four separate decisions

Do not turn qualification, case evaluation, description adequacy, and downstream reliance into one score.

DecisionPassing basisHonest lower result
A.22 identity and CGUS membershipThe four A.22 discriminators identify one structure; its local loci, relations, and constraints define at least two potential continuations across allowed cases.Name the missing discriminator, binding, relation, constraint, or candidate. Keep the artifact as an explanation.
Continuation result for this caseEach candidate has an applicable test or obtaining-relation basis, case inputs, facts, required polarity, time window, and an enabled, disabled, unknown, or error result.Mark the affected candidate unknown or stop on the missing value. Do not revoke an independently established structure.
Description or demonstrative-slice adequacyThe description says what it shows and omits for its declared use. Use C.33 only when a carrier’s loss affects a declared architecture use within C.33’s scope.Narrow or correct the description. Missing publication or loss material does not deny the structure.
A stronger neighboring claimThe method, Work, evidence, assurance, gate, architecture, publication, currentness, or mathematical claim passes its own definition or test.Stop only that stronger use and name its missing rule or basis.

Potential branches and joins remain part of the structure even when the present case enables one or none. A linear teaching slice neither removes the other topology nor fixes the order of performed Work.