A.22:2 - Problem
FPF needs a selected-structure EntityOfConcern that is usable across domain ontologies, mathematical formalisms, architecture notations, and publication forms. Working projects often notice that “the structure” is doing real work:
- dependencies repeat across cases;
- a method or work description hides an invariant relation;
- a model compresses a trace by preserving one relation class and losing others;
- a diagram shows an arrangement but is mistaken for the arrangement itself;
- a mathematical lens exposes preserved structure but is then overread as ontology;
- an architecture discussion needs selected structure over a holon before it can describe architecture.
How can FPF let a practitioner name structure as an EntityOfConcern while preserving the distinction between:
- selected structure and the source-description relation, source-use relation, evidence relation, lens output, simulation, generated representation, or declared substrate from which it was inferred or declared;
- structure and a Description episteme or view of that structure;
- structure and a publication face, diagram, table, graph, or publication form;
- structure and mathematical-lens application;
- structure and another FPF claim kind whose definition or test remains in the cited pattern;
- structure in general and architecture-specific structure selected by
C.30.