Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 07:42:37 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 07:43:27 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:45:10 UTC

A.2:4.5 - Assignment Boundary

A.2.1 defines the U.SystemRoleAssignment family. The family contains directly declared relation species rather than one permissive universal signature. Every species declares:

  • HolderSystemSlot : U.System;
  • a declaration-local AssignedSystemRoleKindSlot whose ValueKind is one exact local system-role-kind domain;
  • any additional real participants needed to distinguish that species; and
  • its own obtaining predicate, applicability, and occurrence-identity rule.

A simple species can declare only the holder and assigned-kind participant meanings. A stronger appointment, authorization, or work arrangement can declare another participant meaning when its actual value changes occurrence identity. The specialized occurrence itself remains a U.SystemRoleAssignment; do not keep a second generic occurrence beside it merely for projection.

An assignment occurrence begins when its predicate starts obtaining for the fixed participants, continues over the maximal uninterrupted predicate-true interval, and ends when a participant changes or the predicate ceases to obtain. A taxonomy episteme, reference scheme, KindSignature, assertion, or interval description can interpret or describe the claim without becoming another world-side participant.

Assignment does not prove classification unless the kind’s signature uses that independently obtaining relation as a feature. Classification does not create an assignment. Neither one proves capability, agency, responsibility, authority, commitment, permission, functioning, method enactment, or performed Work.