A.3.1.MR:3 - Forces · fpf.tools

Force	Tension
Reuse versus historical truth	The project seeks a reusable way, while every source first says something about particular Work or evidence construction.
Coherence versus underdetermination	One neat account is useful, but several accounts may fit the same observations.
Traceability versus tacit contribution	Sources must support each claim, yet important perceptual, embodied, conversational, or discretionary contributions may not be recorded.
Useful grain versus false detail	The receiving use may need one broad reusable way or a safety-critical branch; the evidence should not force the wrong grain.
Discovery power versus modeling choice	Process-mining tools can reveal patterns, but event extraction, naming, correlation, abstraction, and windows shape the result.
Provisional identity versus Method admission	A candidate reusable way needs enough identity to be discussed, without being admitted prematurely as `U.Method`.
Common minimum versus specialist burden	Every domain needs source-to-claim recovery and lowering; complete sampling, elicitation, integration, and trials belong in specialist Method Engineering.