A.3.1.MR:4.1 - Identify each candidate account truthfully

Each positive candidate account is one U.Episteme. Before Method admission, distinguish the possible reusable way as one provisionally identified candidate entity: give it a working designation and enough source-supported participant meanings, applicability hypothesis, intended result or preserved condition, variation, and limits to tell it from rivals. That candidate entity is the account’s EntityOfConcern.

The account’s effective U.ReferenceScheme states only the designation and interpretation rules needed to read source terms such as performer, activity, cue, event, result, and stop. Add measurement or comparison rules only when the account uses them. This provisional entity identification admits neither a U.Method nor a U.MethodDescription.

When two or more candidate reusable ways still fit the evidence, return one account episteme per candidate. Each account may mention the rivals while retaining its own EntityOfConcern. If a later use needs a comparison that can be retained or reused, use A.22 to select the candidate subjects and the comparison relations that already hold and together define one comparison structure, then return a separate episteme about that structure. Otherwise compare them in ordinary working prose. Several candidates do not by themselves form one subject for a combined account.

If no candidate entity or truthful effective scheme can be recovered, lower the result rather than fabricating an account.