A.3.1.MR:5.1 - Pump-inspection recovery

Four independently grounded pump-inspection Work occurrences have video, sensor logs, technician notes, and known performer assignments. Three show the same inspection order. The fourth begins with a vibration cue and reverses two checks.

An analyst applying the recovery Method distinguishes two possible reusable ways under the plant’s current inspection vocabulary: a fixed order with an undocumented exception, and a cue-responsive order. Each candidate gets its own account episteme, candidate subject, interpretation scheme, and source-to-claim support. The account notes that the video misses a tactile check named in interviews and that successful outcomes alone do not distinguish the candidates.

A fifth occurrence is held out. Whether the technician changes order when the vibration cue is present can separate the accounts. Until then, both remain candidates; neither trace nor account is a MethodDescription.

If that held-out occurrence and the remaining evidence support the cue-responsive account while the fixed-order rival no longer fits, recovery can return one candidate account ready for the A.3.1 identity test.