A.3.3:4.3 - Conditional contributions to the work
Use a contribution below when its question arises while constructing or using the state-law account.
| Question now requiring an answer | Contribution |
|---|---|
| Which reusable way is being identified, and does the episteme describe that way? | A.3.1 identifies the U.Method; A.3.2 tests whether an episteme substantively describes that admitted Method. |
| Does a proposed whole Method have the claimed parts and whole behavior? | B.1.5 establishes the exact part Methods, obtaining methodPartOf relations, whole-forming claims and constraints, whole semantics, boundary and reidentification. |
| What work is planned, or what was actually performed? | A.15.2 identifies the U.WorkPlan episteme coordinating possible future Work; A.15.1 independently admits dated performed U.Work and establishes its actuals. |
| Does the question concern a continuing role assignment or a particular state episode within it? | A.2.5 distinguishes the assignment from its SystemRoleAssignmentStateRelation occurrence: one maximal uninterrupted episode in which the specified predicate holds while that assignment remains in force. Select the subject the modeled change or prediction concerns. |
| Is one actual bounded change established? | A.3.4 requires the exact changed referent, temporal extent under its continuity rule or formal ordering boundary, boundary conditions, actual characteristic-state and obtaining direct-relation facts, and continuity or reidentification. |
| Which independently selected organization of constituents and obtaining relations is being used? | A.22 identifies that Structure, including a selected transformation-flow organization. |
| Which operation or law-governed application is admissible over the subject kind? | A.6.1 identifies the U.Mechanism episteme declaring the operation family, laws and admissibility conditions. Use E.20 when introducing or revising a mechanism definition in FPF. |
| Which mathematical substrate or transferred representation supports the model? | Use the direct mathematical Method; use A.6.0 when the model needs a reusable formal-substrate declaration. Section :4.7 specifies the C.29 transfer question. |
| Which observations or source claims support the model or comparison? | A.10 supplies the evidence-provenance account; :4.5 states how observations are compared with the law. |
| Which temporal aspect, such as freshness, delay or a validity window, does the use require, and is the authored temporal claim adequate? | C.27.TA supplies the temporal-aspect description; C.27 assesses the authored temporal claim. |
| What assurance or decision does reliance on the prediction require? | B.3 supplies assurance and A.20 supplies a needed internal-constraint result. Use A.21 for a gate decision or the applicable decision pattern for another decision. Apply :4.6’s prediction-use conditions. |