A.3.3:7 - Conformance Checklist

CC-A3.3-1 (Membership and identity). A.3.3 judges one already identified U.Episteme. That same individual is U.Dynamics only when its exact C.2.1 EntityOfConcern is the changing subject and its ClaimGraph, under its effective U.ReferenceScheme, declares both a state space and a transition law. A.3.3 adds no second identity.

CC-A3.3-2 (Local meanings and applicability). Interpret characteristic names under the effective U.ReferenceScheme. State units, operating region, time base, approximation regime, claim scope when needed, qualification window and source-currentness condition as claim content or their separately governed values.

CC-A3.3-3 (EntityOfConcern). Name the changing EntityOfConcern. Joint modeling uses the independently identified joint subject required by :4.1.

CC-A3.3-4 (State space). The state description names the A.19 CharacteristicSpace, the combinations admitted by the model, and the information required by its law. Characteristics retain their meanings, units, Scales and comparability rules; topology, geometry or coordinate transformations are supplied when the use needs them. Use A.3.3.CC to construct the configuration description and :4.4.1 to complete the state-and-transition account.

CC-A3.3-5 (Transition law). The law states a relation, map, kernel, equation, rule, learned predictor or simulation rule for the declared time base. Its permitted alternatives, conditions selecting among them and any supplied probability law remain recoverable under :4.4.1.

CC-A3.3-6 (Observation relation). Evidence use states how exact Work-side facts when present and separately identified work records, telemetry, measurements, observation records, or source records become observed coordinates. Direct observation is declared rather than assumed.

CC-A3.3-7 (Constraints and applicability). Constraints, invariants, operating region, approximation regime, parameter range, horizon, and scale window are stated before prediction or gate use.

CC-A3.3-8 (Control or planning procedure). When a reusable planning or control way uses the dynamics, identify that Method under A.3.1. Apply A.3.2 to an episteme claimed to describe it; the dynamics membership test remains :4.1.

CC-A3.3-9 (Observed facts and calibration). Attach resource actuals, timestamps and observations to the Work, measurement or source they describe. Relate them to the dynamics through :4.5. Apply its C.2.1 identity and edition conditions when calibration changes the model.

CC-A3.3-10 (Prediction use). Predicted Coordinates used for comparison or gating state the exact model edition, domain, horizon, currentness, error or uncertainty, and every observation, validation, sensitivity, stability, or normalization-composition condition required by that consumer’s policy. No universal non-expansiveness or commutation test substitutes for the direct decision rule.

CC-A3.3-11 (Temporal use). State temporal aspects through C.27.TA and establish the adequacy required of an authored temporal claim through C.27, as specified in :4.3.

CC-A3.3-12 (Representation transfer). Apply :4.7 when representation transfer changes the law’s permitted use, and carry the resulting conditions into the dynamics account.

CC-A3.3-13 (Source-label repair). Recover the relation asserted by an ambiguous source label under :4.8 before applying a membership predicate.

CC-A3.3-14 (Actual change). When an actual transformation is claimed, establish A.3.4’s occurrence basis specified in :4.3. A predicted or simulated trajectory describes change under the model’s premises.