A.3.4.P:4.1 - TransformationWordingRepair note

Use this note only when wording is doing FPF-governed work and a receiving use needs its repair to remain inspectable. An ordinary wording repair requires no separate note.

TransformationWordingRepair:
  EncounteredWording:
  WorkingConcern:
  RecoveredEntityOfConcern:
  ActualTransformationDisposition:
  TransformationOccurrenceBasis:
  ActingSystemDisposition:
  ArchitectureInfluenceDisposition:
  NeighboringClaimAndExactRelation:
  GoverningPattern:
  RetainedUse:
  StopOrReturnCondition:
  BlockedOverread?:
  RemainingReaderUse:

ActualTransformationDisposition is one of: actual bounded transformation recovered, not a transformation, not recovered, not current for this claim, quote-only source wording, or blocking missing value.

TransformationWordingRepair is a temporary wording-use restoration aid. Its retained output is the wording to keep or rewrite, the stop or return condition, and the next subject-pattern application. RetainedUse records which use of the encountered wording is kept; RemainingReaderUse names the practitioner’s next action with the recovered object or claim. BlockedOverread?, also named GroundedBlockedOverread?, is one optional explanatory value under F.19:4’s plausible-reader test. ActingSystemDisposition and ArchitectureInfluenceDisposition are temporary note fields, not FPF kinds or universal relations. An actual transformation occurrence is grounded only through its subject-side occurrence basis.

For a performed-Work actor claim, recover each precise performer’s A.13 core and independently admit the Work under A.15.1; add F.6 afterward only when precise assignment-bound attribution is current. Separately establish the realization, causal, production, or other Work-to-change relation required by the use. For a non-Work actor-side claim, use a participant, operation-application, functioning, causal, or other direct relation supplied by its subject pattern. If no such relation is recoverable, keep the actor claim unresolved. Every influence source retains its kind and only its current architecture, Work, communication, constraint, or candidate-synthesis relation; leave any unrecovered influence claim unresolved.

If an episteme asserts possible, intended, planned, modelled, predicted, or actual change, identify that episteme separately through C.2.1 when the assertion is current. Empirical grounding remains optional and, when current, uses its own exact relation; neither the assertion nor its grounding relation substitutes for the actual transformation basis. Use the governing subject pattern’s requirements when creating a project record, gate decision, work plan, or work occurrence.