CC-A34P-1 | The repair names the encountered wording and the working concern before selecting a replacement. |
CC-A34P-2 | If one actual bounded transformation is current, the repair names or blocks its exact changed referent, temporal or formal boundary, boundary conditions, actual subject facts, and continuity or reidentification basis. |
CC-A34P-3 | Each neighboring object keeps its own kind and is connected only by an exact current relation to the transformation, changed referent, work, architecture candidate, or receiving use. |
CC-A34P-4 | TransformationFlowStructure, graph mathematical description, path mathematical description, and subject-domain network or circuit wording are kept distinct. The selected structure positions, relates, or locates transformation loci and adjacent governed values; composition, parthood, and partlessness require their direct predicates. |
CC-A34P-5 | Method, method description, mechanism, work plan, dated work, evidence, gate, decision, assurance, result, source, and publication claims remain with their subject patterns. |
CC-A34P-6 | Function-like wording closes here only after the actual transformation, performed-work attribution or other exact actor-side relation, every influence source’s exact kind and relation, and exact boundary relations are distinguished; detailed function-kind discrimination remains governed by A.6.F. |
CC-A34P-7 | The repair leaves retained use, stop or return condition, and remaining reader use by value; any optional BlockedOverread? follows F.19:4’s plausible-reader test. |
CC-A34P-8 | F.19 handles ordinary precise-plain-language rewriting. For unresolved change-situation wording, E.10 supplies recognition cues, A.3.4.P restores the transformation ontic neighborhood, and neighboring patterns define or constrain recovered objects and exact relations. |
CC-A34P-9 | For a performed-Work actor claim, recover each precise performer’s A.13 core and independently admit the Work under A.15.1; add F.6 afterward only when precise assignment-bound attribution is current and separately name the Work-to-change relation required by the use. A non-Work actor claim names another exact direct actor-side relation. |
CC-A34P-10 | Possible, intended, planned, modelled, predicted, and merely asserted change stays claim content; any C.2.1 empirical grounding is optional, separate, and not the actual occurrence basis. |