Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:20:09 UTC

A.3.4:7 - Conformance Checklist

CheckConformance statement
CC-A34-1One continuing changed subject, temporal extent or formal ordering boundary, boundary conditions, before/during/after facts, and continuity or reidentification rule identify the transformation. Changed claim content instead yields two C.2.1 epistemes and a separate edition-relation question.
CC-A34-2Actuality and transformation identity require the complete basis in 4.1, even when a method, plan, model, representation, or individual relation fact is available.
CC-A34-3Every subject fact uses the pattern that defines its relation or characteristic; no union-valued transformationRelation field is used.
CC-A34-4Method, method description, operation declaration or binding, plan, work, flow structure, representation, evidence, evaluation, and publication retain separate identities and relations.
CC-A34-5A transformation assertion is a C.2.1 episteme about the actual transformation or exact base facts.
CC-A34-6Time, rate, rhythm, duration, and ordering claims use C.27.TA and C.27 without replacing transformation identity.
CC-A34-7Use E.18 for the selected flow structure and C.29 for mathematical representation; ground actual transformation and work claims separately through A.3.4 and A.15.1.
CC-A34-8Evidence, assurance, gate, acceptance, and decision authority are not inferred from the transformation or its description.
CC-A34-9input, output, result, outcome, deliverable, and handoff remain wording cues until the reader names the participant and relation being asserted.
CC-A34-10When performed U.Work is claimed to cause, realize, or participate in a transformation, the case applies an existing subject predicate, states one A.6.RCD disposition-2 local compound claim over named base facts, or preserves the applicable A.6.RCD stop for the pair. Co-occurrence and a shared subject are insufficient.
CC-A34-11Every proposed component change and whole-configuration change is identified independently. Shared timing, referent, work, flow position, or representation establishes neither composition nor partlessness.
CC-A34-12A use that needs positive transformation composition returns the parked result in 4.2.1.
CC-A34-13A transformation is tested under A.1 only after a future accepted architecture independently supplies the exact candidate and all six A.1 constructive components; the current blocker, evaluation, assertion, evidence, currentness, receiving disposition, and B.2 remain separate.
CC-A34-14When a production claim is current, test production-work participation, entity-identity inception, and production completion separately under A.15.PROD, using the exact work, work part, subject-identity facts, completion criterion, and direct effect facts.