A.6.3.CR:1 - Problem frame

Use this pattern when one already available source line about the same EntityOfConcern needs a second textual form: a report rewrite, summary, translation, or declared filtered restatement. The real job is still same-entity textual re-expression, not explanation, representation change, bridge work, retargeting, evidence, gate authority, or work authorization.

Primary governed case. One textual re-expression of already available source claims whose resolved EntityOfConcern remains the same. The source and receiving epistemes concern that entity; the textual rendering expresses the receiving claims.

First useful move. Separate the source slice, the published slice, the omission or source-loss note, and the admissible use. If preservation is doubtful, name the missing basis or defect; repair it within CR when possible, or name the pattern for the actual changed claim or use.

What goes wrong if missed. A summary, translation, or manager-readable rewrite is treated as harmless editing after it has started hiding explanation work, bridge work, changed authority relation, or a narrower admissible use.

What this buys. One honest same-entity textual rewrite with visible source-relation tether, visible omission or loss notes, and a clear repair or next-pattern route when conservativity fails.

Ordinary use. If the rewrite is admissible only for orientation, source-finding, review, comparison, or planning preparation, one source-slice to published-slice sentence or mini-card with the admissible use and visible omission or source-loss note is enough.

Reliance-facing use. Open the fuller rewrite-admissibility record only when the rewritten text will be externally relied on, disputed, cited as a source-relation reason, used across context, or read as release, gate, work-preparation, engineering-justification, approval, or evidence justification.

Not this pattern when. Not this pattern when the case is primarily explanatory rendering (ExplanationFaithfulnessProfile), representation-scheme change (RepresentationSchemeTransition), changed EntityOfConcern (A.6.4), comparative review (E.17.ID.CR), an F.9 Bridge or bounded-use claim, an optional F.9.1 stance note about such a claim, or a deliberately coarsened rendering whose narrower admissible use, non-admissible downstream use, and source-bearing return have become primary. In that last case, use A.6.3.CSC Controlled Semantic Coarsening.