A.6.3.CR:4.2.b - What the user checks first

The user usually does not begin by filling every field name. The first useful questions are simpler:

1. Is the published result still about the same EntityOfConcern?
2. Does the result remain a textual restatement, or is explanation or a representation-scheme change now primary?
3. Can the reader see what was omitted, softened, or foregrounded?
4. If several source slices or a correspondence witness are doing work, can each receiving claim be traced to one entityOfConcernRef-preserving source line or declared entityOfConcernRef-preserving correspondence witness?
5. Is the source merely pointed at, was it actually used, are the rewritten claims recoverable from it, and is the result admissible for the intended use?
6. If any answer is doubtful, is the problem a missing source or condition, a repairable preservation defect, or an actual changed claim needing another pattern?

If omissions, softening, or filtering are admissible only because the published result is coarsened, tied to narrower admissible use, non-admissible for downstream use, and tied to source-bearing return, the case has crossed out of ordinary conservative retextualization even if the prose still looks like a summary. Use A.6.3.CSC Controlled Semantic Coarsening for that source-to-rendering relation.

Here, source-bearing return means returning to the source-bearing content. First identify any missing source or condition and repair and recheck a preservation defect within CR when the intended restatement can be restored. A changed-claim exit applies when the attempted claim really becomes explanation, representation shift, retargeting, gate, evidence, Work, assurance, or Bridge use: name that claim and use the pattern that defines, constrains, or tests it. Resolve the exact predicate or defining ClaimGraph only when the current claim or a named later use depends on that rule edition. A coarsened textual slice may need both source-bearing return and a changed-claim exit.

Only after these questions are answered does a fuller review record usually become worth writing.