Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:35:10 UTC

A.6.3.CSC:4.4 - Optional branch rules and named-use discipline

Ordinary direct semantic compression needs no coarseningBranch: state its concrete narrower use, blocked use, and return directly. In an exact case, the optional branch cue is used only when it selects one of the additional rules below. It is non-exhaustive, grants no authority, and does not replace concrete loss or use; aggregation is not a catch-all name for a summary.

Optional branch cueAdditional rule it selects
source-pinned surrogate, index, or handleKeep the named source directly reachable and limit the candidate to source-finding, retrieval, or orientation. Naming an authoritySourceRef only routes return to its governed relation; the candidate does not become that authority, evidence, gate, or work source.
privacy or redactionName the sharing boundary, every concrete withheld or weakened distinction, the re-identification or accountability risk being reduced, the exact source review path, and the accountability or gate uses that remain blocked.
exceptional interop-facing simplificationKeep exact X, exact Y, and c recoverable and name the exact operative relation claim, such as bounded contrast, broader/narrower, partial overlap, proxy, or lossy normalization. Use E.17.ID.CR when bounded comparison is primary. For an equivalence, substitution, or projection claim, establish the operative relation and support its bounded use under the pattern that governs that relation. Use F.9 when the claim requires a Bridge between exact local senses with different interpretation bases, and state its bounded-use claim separately; an F.9.1 stance note is optional reader help about that claim.
genuine aggregation or quotient conditionName the distinctions combined and the aggregation rule while exact Y still concerns the same exact EntityOfConcern as X. A bounded selected set may appear inside Y’s claim content but is not an endpoint by itself. If several entities or alternatives become a new class-level or proxy EntityOfConcern, use A.6.4.

A branch cue changes only the additional rule named in its row. Scheme difference, publication adjacency, citation, independent reuse, or high stakes alone selects none of these branches and proves no correspondence or authority.