fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 17338–17348

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 16:02:47 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 16:03:51 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 16:25:20 UTC

A.6.3.NAR:12 - Relations

  • Specializes: A.6.3 for structure-to-sequence narrative construction. The ordinary entry exposes selection, ordering, loss, use, and return; the triggered exact branch states same-EntityOfConcern n : X -> Y and any exact correspondence dependencies.
  • Coordinates with: A.6.3.CR for same-regime textual re-expression, A.6.3.RT for a material representation-scheme transition, A.6.3.CSC for controlled semantic coarsening, A.6.4 for changed EntityOfConcern, and E.17.EFP for explanation-use adequacy.
  • Uses when current: C.2.8 for extractable structural amount, the applicable domain evaluation for its local scale, C.29 for a mathematical estimate’s correspondence, C.33 for captured and lost architecture-relevant structure, and C.34 for an exact correspondence claim needed by architecture work.
  • Coordinates with: A.22.CGUS only when the structure being rendered is independently admitted as a constraint-governed unfolding structure or the optional unfolding block passes CGUS admission and identity tests.
  • Coordinates with: C.35 for generated results entering architecture work, G.2 for its SoTA harvesting/synthesis claims, E.6 and E.11 for learning order and first-entry publication questions, and E.17 for publication-form use, E.17.0 for viewpoint conformance, E.17.AUD for audience, and E.24.PUB for publication questions.
  • Uses when current: G.11 for source-return currentness; D.1–D.5, A.10, and B.3 for the particular ethics, evidence, or assurance claims they define.
  • Uses when current: F.19 for precise plain language in technical narrative and for the plausible-reader test of an optional explanatory guard.
  • Boundary: NAR defines the structure-to-sequence construction, preservation, loss, and return boundary. It does not let a model, graph, stream, source pack, publication, form, carrier, or readable prose substitute for an exact episteme; grant U.View membership; authorize reliance; prove source claims; admit generated output; decide ethics; or turn domain narrative vocabulary into FPF Core.