Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 16:02:47 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 16:03:51 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 17:20:20 UTC

A.6.3.RT:4.6 - Boundary triggers

What became primaryRequired move
Same-regime wording onlyUse A.6.3.CR.
Reader-useful ordering into a narrative pathUse A.6.3.NAR; keep RT only for a remaining material scheme shift.
Explanation adequacy of an existing faceUse E.17.EFP.
Receiving episteme has an independently identified different exact EntityOfConcernUse A.6.4 for the retargeting arrow, its separate C.2.1 bounded-use assertion, and the current-case judgement satisfies, fails, or cannot decide.
Changed kind, ontology frame, predicate set, mathematical domain, or notation without an established EntityOfConcern changeRepeat the C.2.1 identity test and use the exact ontology pattern for any changed claim. Stay in RT when the same EntityOfConcern remains current and representation is the primary change.
Same-signal time/frequency or another mathematical representation changeStay in RT when the same EntityOfConcern remains current and representation is the primary change. Add C.29 only when the use depends on a contested or claim-bearing mathematical lens. A.6.4 opens only after C.2.1 independently identifies a different receiving entity.
Carrier rendering, export or serialization of a chosen representation; OCR or parsing that extracts carrier content without yet constituting a receiving epistemeUse A.7 or the corresponding carrier/extraction pattern.
A narrower-use coarsened receiving epistemeUse A.6.3.CSC with explicit loss and source return.
Cross-context equivalence, substitution, or Bridge useKeep RT for the representation delta. Use F.9 to test a Bridge between two exact F.17 SchemeSenseCell values from different semantic contexts; cite the Bridge only if it obtains, and keep any C.2.1 bounded-use claim separate.
Bounded comparison over already available source epistemesUse E.17.ID.CR; keep RT only for a remaining material representation change.
Problem formulation or abductive prompt, candidate, or selectionUse B.5.2.0 for the prompt and B.5.2 for the abductive loop.
Performed Work, a work plan, or authority to actUse the applicable A.15 pattern for performed Work or a work plan. For an authority-looking claim, select the matching A.6 A6-AW-* row and its direct subject pattern. An RT note or construction supplies neither the Work nor the plan and grants no authority to act.
Evidence or assurance forceKeep RT for preservation/loss and use A.10 or B.3 for that exact claim.
Temporal or dynamics claimUse C.27 or A.3.3 for the claim actually made.
Transformation-flow graph/path, step-validity, or gate-decision claimUse E.18, A.20, or A.21 respectively.
A contested mathematical lensKeep RT for the representation transition and use C.29 only for adequacy of that lens.