A.6.3.RT:5.2 - Positive later-specific table-to-diagram occurrence
For this identity-and-obtaining illustration, take the stated endpoint, scheme, model-use, Work and binding facts as hypothetical givens. The source table, receiving diagram and omitted qualifiers are not shown, so this case does not replay their preservation comparison.
Exact source episteme CoolingLoopRelationTable-X and exact receiving episteme CoolingLoopDependencyDiagram-Y state the same two connection claims about CoolingLoop-7 under effective schemes TabularPlantScheme-5 and DirectedDiagramPlantScheme-3. Y is a candidate episteme, not automatically a U.View.
Scheme-description epistemes TabularPlantSchemeDescription-5 and DirectedDiagramPlantSchemeDescription-3 concern their respective schemes and state their interpretation rules. Independently selected CoolingLoopReviewModelUseStructure satisfies A.1.1 because its model-use organization changes this review. A.13 identifies PlantModelingTool-2 as the actual performer through the exact covering assignment. A.15.1 independently admits dated CoolingLoopDiagrammingWork-18. Because this example states precise assignment-bound attribution, its direct case fact says that the Work was performed under the same exact A.13 assignment, so the F.6 check is positive. If that direct fact were missing or another F.6 condition failed, the Work would remain intact and only the attribution would be unresolved. The Work’s A.6.1 bindings use all six participants. DiagramCoolingLoop : X -> Y is the exact construction; it states claim construction, endpoint-scheme relation, same exact EntityOfConcern, preserved connection claims, omitted table qualifiers and their recoverability, prohibited strengthening, applicability, topology-inspection use, and return to X.
Only then does this occurrence obtain:
RepresentationSchemeTransitionRelation@Context(
CoolingLoopReviewModelUseStructure,
CoolingLoop-7,
CoolingLoopRelationTable-X,
CoolingLoopDependencyDiagram-Y,
TabularPlantSchemeDescription-5,
DirectedDiagramPlantSchemeDescription-3)
Its transition-description episteme cites the Work, construction, exact source relations, omitted qualifiers, topology-inspection use, blocked control-timing/work-order inference, and return to X. Rows become directed edges; pairwise lookup becomes topology inspection; each edge links back to its source-table relation. Publication, diagram form, and SVG carrier remain separate. Y is a U.View only if E.17.0 conformance independently obtains.