Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:25:20 UTC

A.6.5:5.2 - Hypothetical physical-assembly boundary

Bearing_B isPartOf Pump_P may remain a readable source claim, but current A.14 supplies no generic or installed-part occurrence-identity rule based on removal, reinstallation, installation interval, or installation work. PartHolonSlot, WholeHolonSlot, and their RefKinds are therefore only a hypothetical declaration candidate until an accepted direct part-relation pattern states the participant meanings, predicate, applicability, and same-versus-new-occurrence rule. Do not claim current conformance or an individuated part-relation occurrence from this sketch.

Conditional on such a future declaration, changing a proposed part designation from Bearing_B_Ref to Bearing_C_Ref could be ValueKind-compatible while the direct relation remains false because current case facts do not satisfy its predicate. Until that parthood relation is defined, keep the bearings, pump, installation work, proposed part relation, assertion, designations, and representation separate. The counterexample demonstrates that typed substitution cannot create obtaining; it does not supply the missing parthood settlement.