fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 21466–21478

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 16:02:47 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 16:03:51 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 16:50:10 UTC

A.6.6:4.4 - What a reusable direct-relation declaration must say

For a named receiving use that genuinely needs a RelationSignature, the direct relation definition states:

  • the dependent and base participant meanings and direction or symmetry;
  • the obtaining predicate and applicability;
  • the occurrence-identity rule supplied by the direct pattern;
  • admissible participant kinds and reference modes;
  • any scope, time, evidence, or cross-local condition that changes this predicate or the named reuse; and
  • the direct continuity or change rules, when that history is current.

Different exact local kinds, F.17 senses, scopes, or ReferencePlanes are handled by their applicable direct relations. Source difference alone creates no Bridge. A RelationSignature declares reusable content; the reusable form by itself neither asserts a current case nor establishes an occurrence.