Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:40:10 UTC

A.6.9:4.2 - Explicit claim skeleton

Use this table for the semantic branch. The action, direction, rule, and tolerance rows apply only to a proposed use of an obtaining Bridge.

ItemWhen requiredMeaning and stop
SourceSenseCellRef, ReceivingSenseCellRefevery Bridge candidateExact F.17 addresses; unresolved endpoints stop the semantic branch.
semantic-context projectionsevery Bridge candidateDerived <ReferenceScheme, LocalSenseClaim> pairs; they must differ for F.9.
BridgePredicateProfileevery Bridge candidateExact by-value relation semantics only; a label or id is insufficient.
BridgeKind and relation orientationprofile and readable explanationWhat semantic correspondence or difference is claimed; not a use licence.
applicability / Γ_time, truth condition, dependenciesprofileWhen and how the direct predicate is tested; missing dependencies stop without inventing an occurrence.
action uevery proposed useWhat the reader proposes to compare, substitute, translate, publish, or otherwise do.
direction devery proposed useExact use-source to use-receiving order; relation symmetry supplies no direction by implication.
rule revery proposed useThe correspondence rule the action will follow.
tolerance tevery proposed useWhich semantic loss is acceptable for this action; observed loss remains evidence.
polarity and effective ReferenceSchemeevery bounded-use claimWhether the claim is affirmative or negative and how its designations are interpreted.
A.10 or B.3 branchwhen someone will rely on the claimThe exact evidence-provenance relation plus local disposition, or the B.3 claim or explicit disposition selected by its trigger.
permission resultonly when permission is requiredCite the exact A.2.8.PER result the use needs: an obtaining strong grant, weak non-prohibition finding, exercise relation, or conflict result. Policy and predicates supply grounds; they are not that result.
receiving-object refonly when the use is said to have happenedExact Work, assertion, publication, relation, application, or other object under its subject pattern.
ClaimMode and card EntityOfConcernonly when a card paysActual card concerns the obtaining Bridge; candidate or negative card concerns the admitted F.9 Bridge relation kind and carries proposed endpoints and profile in its ClaimGraph.

Only the two endpoint cells fill the direct relation’s participant slots. Use content is ClaimGraph content, not another relation participant or profile component.