A.6.9:5.3 - Published NAICS language and a Conformist cue

Start with separate objects. C.2.1 identifies exact model episteme edition NAICS-2022-ClassificationEpisteme by its exact ClaimGraph, EntityOfConcern, and effective ReferenceScheme; A.1 independently identifies exact IndustryClassificationApplication-7 : U.System. If availability matters, E.24.PUB separately tests EpistemePublicationRelation(NAICS-2022-ClassificationEpisteme, ClassificationAudienceDeclaration-2, ClassificationUseDeclaration-5, NAICS-2022-TableForm, NAICS-2022-PDFCarrier) together with its exact form-expression and form-bearing occurrences. The episteme, publication occurrence, form, carrier, declarations, and application system keep different identities. Publication establishes availability to the exact audience and use declarations. Access, adoption, applicability, actual use, performed Work, and any application-side parthood remain claims under their own predicates and facts.

Recover the use branch before selecting structure. Require HolderSystem(ClassificationAssignment-3)=IndustryClassificationApplication-7, exact F.6 performedUnderAssignment(ClassificationWork-4, ClassificationAssignment-3), and the application’s actual use of the selected NAICS content during that Work concerning exact ClassifiedOrganization-42; only then may ModelUseRelation(ClassificationAssignment-3, NAICS-2022-ClassificationEpisteme, ClassificationWork-4, ClassifiedOrganization-42) obtain. A positive NAICSClassificationModelUseStructure additionally requires exact ModelApplicabilityRelation(NAICS-2022-ClassificationEpisteme, ClassifiedOrganization-42, ClassificationClaimScope), fixed-content coherence with the exact classification-expression episteme under a declared predicate and ReferenceScheme, exact applied constraint claims naming the edition and classification distinctions to preserve, and NAICSClassificationFrame: “Which NAICS edition and distinctions govern the classification of ClassifiedOrganization-42 as a complete organization?” Model use comes from the actual-use facts above; any application-system parthood claim requires its own predicate and facts. Without the complete A.1.1/A.22 basis, stop at publication availability or the exact direct relation that does obtain.

Treat DDD Conformist only as a Plain cue to a proposed directed subject dependency. Preserve the exact proposed source, target, direction, adoption condition, dependency predicate, update authority, required preserved meaning, permitted loss, claim scope, and standard-edition basis. A positive occurrence would additionally require exact participant meanings and fillers, its direct relation kind and predicate, obtaining and applicability conditions, occurrence identity and recurrence, all supplied by one compatible direct subject governor. The label, published-language status, table edge, and selected structure may cue or represent the proposal; only a compatible direct subject governor supplies its predicate and occurrence rules. When no such governor is current, return missing CROSS-LOCALITY-BRIDGE governor.

An F.9 Bridge may separately obtain between exact NAICS-side and application-side SchemeSenseCell values and may support one bounded interpretation claim. Adoption, dependency, update authority, preservation of application meaning, and a subject-crossing occurrence remain separately governed claims. A later NAICS edition is a distinct C.2.1 episteme. Before NAICSClassificationModelUseStructure is selected for that edition, establish applicability, actual use, coherence, preservation, loss, and any governed crossing for the exact edition. Republishing unchanged claims in another form or carrier changes the publication objects only; it does not establish the application’s use of another episteme edition.