A.6.A:4.8a - Classify the recovered boundary-bearing claim

When the recovered claim is boundary-bearing, use its actual A.6.B classification:

• L — the rule that defines or constrains the recovered subject, including an actual relation predicate when that is the claim; applicable enactor/site discipline and the F.9/F.9.1 boundary retain their direct governors.
• A — admissibility conditions for the recovered result in selection, triage, automation or publication.
• D — a generic prescription with its exact normative episteme and applicable content, such as the rule to name the invited actor or required authority/override source. An asserted individual duty or commitment additionally needs its own obtaining basis; a generic prescription does not invent that individual occurrence.
• E — an exact adjudicable claim about actual Work, an evaluation or observation result, or a produced carrier’s condition under A.6.B. Cite the relevant sensory result, event, probe or log as its evidence; a list of trace or carrier references is not itself the E claim.

Do not let bare action-first language carry L-, A-, D-, or E-classified claims, admissible-use consequences, or evidence consequences by itself.