A.6.A:9 - Consequences

Benefits. This pattern turns ambiguous action-oriented wording into a usable subject claim, question or exact gap. It preserves the distinctions needed for embodied, ecological, learned-policy, interface and control uses while avoiding a compulsory intermediate record.

It also complements C.16.Q cleanly: C.16.Q repairs evaluative ambiguity, while A.6.A repairs action-inviting ambiguity.

Trade-offs and mitigations. The pattern adds authoring overhead and can feel heavy in early exploration.

Mitigation: allow bare action-first language in Plain exploratory notes, but require repair before it enters Tech prose, normative prose, boundary, automation, assurance, or publication use.