A.6.B:8.4.3 - Example 1 — Software engineering (SLO-ish API latency)
A.6.B:8.4.3.1 - Draft sentence (non-conformant)
“This API guarantees p95 latency < 200ms.”
A.6.B:8.4.3.2 - Atomize + Classify (L/A/D/E)
L-API-01 (Definition).
p95_latency(window W, population P, unit U, method M) is defined as … (formal measurement definition).
(Lives in Signature.Laws or a referenced measurement definition pack.)
L-API-02 (Interface signature). The API endpoints and parameters are as declared (including parameter passing discipline / units). (Signature-level structure.)
A-API-01 (Gate predicate: admissibility).
The claim “p95 < 200ms” is admissible only under declared load profile + deployment region + sampling method + window:
AdmissibleLatencyClaim := (region=US) ∧ (concurrency≤X) ∧ (payload≤Y) ∧ (W=5m) ∧ (M=HDRHistogram@v…) ∧ (P=requests that match filter F)
(References L-API-01 for definition.)
D-API-01 (Commitment).
Admitted service-maintaining system ServiceOperations-A is the actual duty bearer of separately obtaining LatencyCommitment-API-01 : U.Commitment; under that commitment it SHALL meet p95_latency < 200ms when A-API-01 holds, adjudicated per L-API-01 using the carriers and observation conditions in E-API-01.
(References L-API-01 and A-API-01 by ID; does not restate them.)
D-API-02 (Operational duty).
Admitted operations system SRE-A is the actual duty bearer of separately obtaining IncidentNoteCommitment-API-02 : U.Commitment; it SHALL publish incident notes when LatencyCommitment-API-01 is violated and SHALL avoid claiming compliance outside A-API-01.
(References D-API-01 and A-API-01 by ID.)
E-API-01 (Evidence / carriers).
For LatencyEvaluation-T1 over Γ_time=[t1..t2], actual carriers TraceBatch-T1, Histogram-H1, DashboardSnapshot-D1, and SamplingConfiguration-S1 were produced or observed under the operating and sampling conditions in A-API-01, using the metric and computation definition in L-API-01. An A.10 evidence-provenance path links those exact carriers to LatencyEvaluation-T1 and its LatencyResult-T1.
(References A-API-01 and L-API-01 for the operating conditions and metric definition.)
D-API-03 (Duty-to-evidence linkage).
Admitted telemetry-maintaining system TelemetryOperations-A is the actual duty bearer of separately obtaining TelemetryRetentionCommitment-API-03 : U.Commitment; it SHALL retain or expose the actual carriers referenced in E-API-01 for the audit window required by policy.
(References E-API-01 by ID.)
E-API-02 (Observed value claim).
For interval Γ_time = [t1..t2] under conditions pinned to A-API-01 and using carriers in E-API-01, LatencyEvaluation-T1 produced LatencyResult-T1 with observed p95_latency = 173ms (computed per L-API-01).
(References A-API-01, L-API-01 and E-API-01.)
A.6.B:8.4.3.3 - Triangle decomposition (explicit)
- A-API-01 is “the predicate”.
- D-API-01 → A-API-01 states the commitment under the gate or envelope.
- E-API-01 → A-API-01 binds adjudication (carriers used to decide the gate or commitment).
- D-API-03 → E-API-01 expresses retention and exposure obligations for those carriers.
A.6.B:8.4.3.4 - Readable recomposition
Tech recomposition (L/A/D/E-classified claim bundle, short):
L-API-01defines p95 latency computation.A-API-01specifies when the latency claim is admissible.D-API-01states the commitment under that envelope.E-API-01lists adjudicable carriers and conditions used to adjudicateA-API-01.D-API-02states the operational incident-note duties.D-API-03states the retention and exposure duties for carriers inE-API-01.E-API-02reports observed performance underA-API-01forΓ_time=[t1..t2].
Plain recomposition (one paragraph, readable):
“The API’s latency target uses the p95 definition in L-API-01, and the mechanism admits its evaluation only under operating envelope A-API-01. ServiceOperations-A has the latency duty stated in D-API-01. Adjudication uses the telemetry carriers listed in E-API-01; TelemetryOperations-A has the retention duty in D-API-03, and SRE-A has the incident-note duty in D-API-02. Under that envelope, the observed p95 over Γ_time=[t1..t2] was 173ms (E-API-02).”