A.6.H:9 - Consequences
| Benefits | Costs and mitigations |
|---|---|
| Decidable disagreements | The practitioner must name the exact subject and receiving use before arguing about the word. |
| Local repair | One sentence may become several direct claims; stop after the claims the receiving use actually needs. |
| Separate rule sources | Mereology, episteme identity, Work, measurement, evidence, publication, and assurance retain their distinct rules. |
| Honest uncertainty | An unresolved case blocks only the named use; the candidate readings and discriminating questions remain explicit. |
| Reusable evidence-use claims | Recognition facts and evidence-use claims can be checked independently; B.3 assurance applies only for an actual named assurance claim and use. |
| Less ontology by wording | Familiar trigger words no longer mint kinds, relations, structures, or lifecycle objects. |
The practical test is simple: if “whole” matters, name the thing, the relation, and what the reader may do with the claim.