fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 18504–18554

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 10:05:06 UTC

A.6.P.WMR:4.4 - Ordinary sentence shapes

These shapes are informative drafting aids. A practitioner MAY use one after the ordinary answer is known. Only distinctions current for the receiving use appear. In either direct-relation shape, the relation wording is an ordinary reading of one exact RelationKind with its resolving direct pattern or relation-declaration episteme; any assertion id remains outside that governor position. The actually-obtaining and historically-obtained shapes are available only after a separate fact says that their exact participants and extent satisfy the predicate; the compact sentence need not copy the fact fixture or evidence package.

Reusable declaration:
  Under <applicability>, <exact declaration> declares that <exact entity position>
  has <participant or predicate meaning>; no particular intended or obtaining relation follows.

Particular intended relation:
  <exact WorkPlan or other intended-work episteme> states that <exact entity>
  is intended to <direct relation> <exact related object> under <condition>;
  actual obtaining remains open.

Actually obtaining now:
  <exact entity> <direct relation in ordinary words> <exact related object>
  during <current exact extent>; governed by <RelationKind token> under <direct pattern or relation-declaration episteme>.

Historically obtained:
  <exact entity> <direct relation in ordinary words> <exact related object>
  during <exact past extent>; governed by <RelationKind token> under <direct pattern or relation-declaration episteme>.

Governed negative:
  During <exact extent>, <exact entity> did not <direct relation in ordinary words> <exact related object>
  under <RelationKind token>, with defining or constraining content at <SubjectPatternLocator>; <separate case facts> satisfy
  <the direct pattern's or declaration's explicit negative or non-obtaining criterion or closure basis>,
  and no relation occurrence is individuated.

Obtaining `U.Commitment`, promised relation separate:
  <U.Commitment occurrence> obtains for <actual duty-bearing System or separately governed party>, with <modality>, <referents>, <scope>, and <validity interval>;
  <current prescription>, <exact constitutive rule>, <rule-required actual instituting basis>, and <actual facts> satisfy the A.2.8 direct predicate;
  the promised relation remains <intended | unfulfilled | fulfilled at exact extent> under its own <RelationKind token> and <SubjectPatternLocator>.

Factually unsupported:
  Under <known governor>, the <positive or negative> claim that <exact relation sentence> is not assertable
  because <available facts> fail <applicable named condition>; no opposite polarity follows.

Missing information:
  Under <known governor>, whether <exact entity> <candidate direct relation> <exact related object> obtains
  is unresolved because <named deciding fact> is unavailable.

Missing governor:
  Whether <exact participant> <proposed direct relation> <exact related participant> obtains
  is unresolved for <named use> because no current definition supplies <predicate, applicability, or occurrence rule>;
  name a future pattern or declaration need only when one is identifiable. No PatternID or case fact is required for a rule that does not exist.

For example, CF-17 was not consumed by W-204 does not follow merely because the positive consumption fact fails or is unavailable. It closes as a governed negative sentence only if the direct pattern or declaration for machining resource consumption supplies an applicable non-consumption criterion or complete closure basis for the exact quantity, work, and extent and separate case facts satisfy it. Otherwise the proposed positive claim remains factually unsupported or missing-information, or the relation question remains missing-governor, according to the independently recovered deficit.

A practitioner MAY retain the trigger word as optional Plain orientation after the direct sentence is recoverable. The direct sentence and its dimensions, not the familiar label or support state, carry the claim into planning, work, evaluation, delivery, acceptance, transfer, or receiving use.