CC-A6PWMR-1 | A conforming practitioner MUST keep one exact relation-bearing claim as the EntityOfConcern and MUST treat trigger words only as recognition aids. |
CC-A6PWMR-2 | A conforming practitioner MUST name the exact entity and admitted kind independently of its boundary-word role. |
CC-A6PWMR-3 | A conforming practitioner MUST name the exact related object and MUST split several current related objects into separate claims. |
CC-A6PWMR-4 | Before every positive direct relation, a conforming practitioner MUST establish two independent premises: (1) the exact RelationKind resolves through a direct rule or already published relation-declaration episteme to participant meanings, obtaining condition, applicability, and defining source; and (2) a separate case fact says that the exact participants at the exact extent satisfy that condition. The practitioner MUST keep that fact distinct from any token, declaration, work or transformation identity, chronology, record, assertion episteme, local id, or evidence item. A failed fact returns factually unsupported, an unavailable fact returns missing-information, and only an absent governor returns missing-governor with exact participants, proposed predicate, affected use, and absent definition. A future pattern or declaration need is named only when identifiable. |
CC-A6PWMR-4a | Before every governed negative direct-relation claim, a conforming practitioner MUST recover the current exact governor, its applicable negative or non-obtaining criterion or closure basis, and separate case facts satisfying that basis at the exact extent. The practitioner MUST NOT infer negative polarity from failure or unavailability of the positive fact and MUST NOT individuate an obtaining relation occurrence. |
CC-A6PWMR-5 | A conforming practitioner MUST keep claim subject, modality and exact extent, polarity, and recovery or support state independently recoverable whenever any can change the answer and MUST check WMR-WF1. The practitioner MUST NOT require the four labels when a simple sentence already carries the only material reading. |
CC-A6PWMR-6 | A conforming practitioner MUST NOT substitute a direct subject-relation claim, A.6.1 operation-application binding, local A.15.PROD or A.6.RCD claim, and non-assertability result for one another. |
CC-A6PWMR-7 | A conforming practitioner MUST return first the shortest ordinary direct sentence or exact factually-unsupported, missing-information, or missing-governor result and MUST open additional apparatus only for a named receiving use. |
CC-A6PWMR-8 | Authors and modelers MUST NOT introduce a universal input, output, result, outcome, deliverable, handoff, evidence, production, actual-filling, status, work-result, or transformation-result kind or relation. This checks WMR-I1. |
CC-A6PWMR-9 | A conforming practitioner MUST NOT infer an actual relation or transformation from a plan, description, token match, application record, work record, measurement, result episteme, adjacency, or shared referent. This checks WMR-I2. |
CC-A6PWMR-10 | For a composition-dependent claim, a conforming practitioner MUST preserve independently grounded claims and MUST return either the direct composition result or its exact blocker without stopping those independent claims. |
CC-A6PWMR-11 | When a label is relied on as performed work, a conforming practitioner MUST state its candidate designation and required granularity, apply A.15.1, and use only the established exact Work occurrence admitted under U.Work, lowered neighboring object, or blocker. After one exact occurrence is established, the practitioner MAY apply F.18 for durable naming. |
CC-A6PWMR-12 | When entity-identity inception is current, a conforming practitioner MUST state the exact candidate entity or pre-inception basis, exact Work question, and receiving use, apply A.15.PROD, and use only the resulting local inception claim or blocker. The practitioner MUST NOT substitute Work, change, rendering, an identity rule, or proximity for that result. |
CC-A6PWMR-13 | When evidence, warrant, assurance, gate, currentness, publication, or reliance is current, a conforming practitioner MUST apply the relevant check or use to the exact direct subject claim, exact A.6.1 application binding, exact local A.15.PROD or A.6.RCD claim, or exact non-assertability result and MUST use only the separately established result. For non-assertability, the practitioner MUST preserve factually unsupported, missing-information, and missing-governor as independent reasons; only missing-governor may open an identifiable future definition need. The practitioner MUST NOT treat support or assurance as polarity, obtaining, or a field of the relation-bearing claim. |