A.6.P:11.2 - Representation and implementation stress tests
These sources do not decide what exists. They test whether a representation can preserve the ontological distinctions selected above without turning a statement, row, graph term, tuple, or reifier into the world-side occurrence.
| Representation or implementation line | Distinction tested | Bounded use in A.6.P |
|---|---|---|
TypeDB 3.x links statement and current relation model | A query can select an explicit relation variable with named source-language role players, while shorthand remains available when no reference to the represented item is needed. | Test progressive explicitness, not ontology. A.6.P makes explicit occurrence identity conditional on a named receiver. TypeDB demonstrates one implementable representation; it does not establish the FPF relation kind, actual participation, obtaining condition, or identity rule. |
| RDF 1.2 Concepts, Candidate Recommendation Snapshot, 7 April 2026 | RDF distinguishes proposition expressed by a triple term, assertion of a triple, and reifiers used for further statements. | Test proposition, assertion, and reifier separation. A statement term or graph edge can represent claim content but cannot establish that the direct relation obtains. |