Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:25:10 UTC
A.6.P:3 - Forces
Force
Tension
Readability and precision
Ordinary work benefits from short relation sentences, while reuse may need exact participant typing and identity.
Relation realism and epistemic access
A relation may obtain independently of its assertion, yet engineering work reaches it through observations, epistemes, descriptions, publications, and representations.
Generality and grounding
The method applies across domains, while every repaired relation needs domain-grounded participants and an exact obtaining condition.
Minimal explicitness and later claims
Premature declarations and records create burden; insufficient detail makes a named later comparison, substitution, change, or reference unreliable.
Natural-language direction and relation polarity
Inverse wording can aid readers, while silent participant reversal can change the predicate.
Stable world-side facts and evolving epistemes
The relation kind can stay stable while assertions, declarations, evidence, descriptions, publications, and representations change independently.
Grammar and ontology
Verb-shaped wording can express a relation, work, method, or change, but grammatical form settles neither identity nor agency.