| Replace a broad word with a more technical synonym | The same participants and obtaining condition remain unresolved. | Ground the objects, select the direct relation, and write the readable sentence before naming. |
| Turn every relation phrase into a record-shaped episteme | Representation burden appears before any receiver needs the episteme or occurrence identity. | Use the direct sentence and apply the A.6.REL receiving-use test. |
| Let the declaration make the relation obtain | A declaration episteme is confused with the world-side relation. | Keep reusable laws and SlotSpecs in A.6.0 and A.6.5; keep obtaining and identity with the pattern that defines the relation. |
| Treat the actual participant as occupying a declaration component | World-side participation is replaced by a schema metaphor. | State participation under the direct participant meaning; use the SlotSpec only inside a compatible reusable declaration. |
| Treat relation-dependent wording as an intrinsic kind | A participant described as result, input, or next continuation loses its own kind. | Apply the three-way distinction and use C.3 only for actual typed reasoning. |
| Use one generic relation-change verb | Occurrence change, assertion revision, declaration revision, evidence change, reference retargeting, EntityOfConcern retargeting, and representation change collapse. | Select the changed object and use the operation governed for that object. |
| Infer agency or identity from an active verb | Grammar is treated as ontological evidence. | Recover the exact acting system or direct identity rule independently of grammar. |
| Preserve a hidden union as a long list | The predicate changes meaning across listed participant kinds. | Recover the common predicate or split the relation kind and any compatible declarations. |
| Reverse a sentence for style | Participant meanings and polarity can change silently. | Use the direct inverse law or keep the forward predicate explicit. |
| Use a graph, tuple, function, arrow, or table as ontological proof | Representation is mistaken for what it represents. | State an explicit C.29 correspondence and keep world-side obtaining and identity with the direct pattern. |