A.6.REL:4.1.7 - Name only the minimum current object
The relation-object architecture organizes the distinct objects that may become current. For each relation sentence, select only the object needed by the current use. Stable relation-kind semantics belong once in the direct relation pattern or ontic. A reusable declaration belongs once in its RelationSignature. A durable name belongs once in its F.18 naming settlement. Later prose names the object current for its use and cites the subject pattern for already established neighboring objects.
| Current use | Minimum sufficient text | Add another object only when |
|---|---|---|
| ordinary direct relation assertion | one readable direct relation sentence naming the actual participants | predicate interpretation or occurrence identity changes the next engineering move |
| repeated typed assertion or description episteme | cite the direct RelationSignature; carry exact relation-participant designations in content positions corresponding to its SlotSpecs; if a concrete representation field carries one, keep its source name and state the explicit declaration or representation correspondence | the declaration, ValueKind, RefKind, designation, or correspondence itself is under examination |
| occurrence-dependent assertion or description episteme | use the relation-occurrence designator or reference and cite the direct occurrence-identity rule | participant meaning, obtaining, continuity, or repeated-occurrence identity is disputed |
| representation-dependent use | name the source representation element, the represented FPF object or claim content, and their explicit correspondence | representation preservation or loss is current under its applicable pattern, structural equivalence is current under C.34, or cross-context sameness is current under A.6.9 |
| ontology or wording repair | recover the current object and only the adjacent relations needed to resolve the wording | the repair has not yet recovered a unique current object and subject pattern |
In recognition text, prefer the readable direct relation sentence. Put the reusable declaration, occurrence-identity rule, naming settlement, or representation correspondence in nearby Tech or assurance text governed by its direct pattern, and refer to it when another declared use depends on it. Precision comes from recoverable subject patterns and explicit relations between adjacent objects, not from repeating the complete architecture.
This rule keeps elaboration additive. Each new receiving use introduces only the object on which that use depends and the object’s direct relation to an already recoverable object. When the use stops at the world-side relation, the prose adds no signature, occurrence-description, naming, or representation apparatus.