A.6.RSIG:4.4 - Neighbor boundaries
Neighbor boundaries remain explicit:
- use
A.6.Bwhen the reader needs to classify the boundary claims asL/A/D/E; E.17.0tests viewpoint/view membership;E.17publishes reader-facing forms of an already accepted engineering account; useE.24.PUBwhen publication occurrence, form, or carrier identity affects the recognition use;E.10.D2recovers description-episteme and specification-use distinctions; useE.10cues withinF.19for wording,A.6.Pfor under-specified direct relations, andF.18for durable naming and its collision checks;C.16.Qrepairs overloaded recognition or discoverability quality wording;C.25applies when the quality-family claim depends on several differently typed contributors; a single-Characteristic claim stays with its direct Characteristic pattern;- the relevant authoritative pattern body governs pattern semantics when the encountered description is one pattern-local opening.
The four-part split for pattern-local recognition is:
| Recognition concern | Governing FPF pattern or source | What it governs |
|---|---|---|
| Generic first-contact description recognition | A.6.RSIG | The neutral cue shape: description, carrier or projection, definitionEpistemeRef, exclusions, and a false neighbor when §4.1’s grounded-guard condition holds. |
| Local placement and form | E.8 | How the pattern’s Problem frame carries the first-reading role. |
| Actual local semantics | The pattern itself | The pattern’s governed object, solution, consequences, and conformance law. |
| Cross-pattern comparison | E.11 and I.2 | Candidate patterns, tempting wrong patterns, reclassification of the reader’s question, and expanded entry-disambiguation cases. |