A.6:12 - Relations

• Uses A.6.B as the classification authority: A.6.B:8.4.1 selects the job of permission wording. A.6 maps the resulting atomic claim to the stack; it does not put every A.2.8.PER object in D. The filled case in A.6.B:8.4.5.4 is the concrete handshake.
• Coordinates actual effects without merging them: Use A.15.1 only to identify a grounded dated Work occurrence; use A.3.4 for an independently identified actual transformation, including spontaneous or formal change with no Work; state each interaction, causal, production, speech-act, evaluation, evidence, or result claim through its applicable predicate and pattern. A description or carrier creates none of them.
• Constrains signature writing: Reinforces A.6.0 separation of Laws vs operational gates (AdmissibilityConditions live in mechanisms).
• Constrains mechanism writing: Uses A.6.1 for OperationAlgebra, LawSet, AdmissibilityConditions and Applicability; local transport and evidence-interface sections retain their own claim classification.
• Requires EntityOfConcern and Description-episteme / publication-carrier discipline: Uses A.7 to prevent category mistakes; ties evidence to evidence carriers and publication faces to descriptions.
• Coordinates U.View, U.Viewpoint, and publication use: E.17.0 governs viewpoint and view membership; MVPK selects exact epistemes, viewpoints, face uses, and publication forms; A.6.3 governs only optional source-to-receiving construction.
• Unpacks “contract” talk: When boundary ambiguity changes interpretation or use, A.6.C applies A.2.3, A.2.8, A.2.8.PER, and A.2.9 to keep promise content, speech act, commitment or grant explicit; use A.15.1 only to identify dated Work, and its §4.6 dispatch requires the exact subject predicate for each application-result, production, change, delivery/transfer, evidence, or acceptance claim.
• Uses relation-specific declaration disciplines: use A.6.5 when an already recovered direct relation needs reusable participant typing. Use A.6.6 when basedness wording hides the dependent, base or direct predicate; stop at the ordinary assertion when it answers the receiving question.
• Coordinates with C.28 CausalUse-CAL: When boundary prose uses causal-use evidence or a causal-use verdict to justify deployment, release, duty, commitment, or admissibility, A.6 splits the boundary sentence while C.28 carries the causal-use question, CausalityLadderRung, estimand, support basis, support verdict, and supported causal use and unsupported causal use.
• Coordinates work and consequences: A.15.1 supplies only a dated U.Work occurrence. Its §4.6 table routes an application/result binding, production, change, evaluation result, evidence use, delivery/transfer, and acceptance to separate subject patterns. A.15, A.10, B.3, A.21, and A.20 govern the exact enactment-alignment, evidence, assurance, gate, or constraint claim when current.