Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:40:20 UTC

A.7.1:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Consequence focus vs ontological completenessThe next action may need one distinction, while the subject admits many legitimate constructions.
Subject-pattern reuse vs missing ontologyExisting patterns should decide ordinary cases, yet a durable missing distinction sometimes must be admitted.
Early stop vs hidden projection lossCoarse accounts are economical until a consequential counterexample defeats them.
Domain inquiry vs ontology analysisMissing facts require observation; conflated kinds require conceptual repair.
Working account vs reusable recordA local decision may be enough; recurrence, automation, dispute, or high consequence can justify durable capture.