A.7.1:5 - Archetypal Grounding

Support occurrence inquiry. A maintenance claim says bearing B1 continued supporting shaft S1 after removal and reinstallation. The A.7.1 analysis method is already selected; the bearing/shaft subject and the applicable subject predicate are inputs and constraints, so the work creates no option set. Recover the exact load-bearing relation and its obtaining and occurrence-identity rules before counting occurrences. If an admitted subject rule makes removal end one occurrence and reinstallation begin another, apply that rule and the current facts to repair the warranty and incident-attribution claim. If the receiving use needs that distinction but no applicable rule defines it, return the missing governor and blocked claim. Use A7CP-01 and A7CP-10 only when their claims are load-bearing in this reasoning; neither compact claim defines the subject relation.

Missing telemetry non-use. A team cannot determine pump state because telemetry was never collected. State kinds, evidence relations, and candidate actions are already clear. The result is returnToDirectOwner for measurement and evidence work with the blocked state claim; no premise-use occurrence or ontology artifact is minted.

Construction-changing case. A maintenance set uses “part” both for an item that belongs under the set’s own rule and for ComponentOf. Removing the item changes the construction only in the ComponentOf case. Apply C.13 to the disputed item’s construction, repair the maintenance claim, and leave unrelated belongs-to claims unchanged.