Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:15:03 UTC
A.7.1:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
Anti-pattern
Repair
Begin from a glossary or full ontology checklist.
Begin from the affected result and defeated claim; enter only the capable locus.
Treat missing evidence as a missing kind.
Return to measurement/evidence with the exact blocked claim.
Run constructive analysis for every typed relation.
Stop when direct kinds, positions, direction, time, and identity already determine the move.
Treat a graph, predicate, or formal class as the world construction.
Recover CT2R loss and the direct subject construction before reverse inference.
Let the MethodDescription episteme, reader designation, local system-role kind, or assignment do the Work.
Recover the exact performing U.System through A.13, then let A.15.1 independently admit the dated ontology-analysis U.Work and enacted Method. Add F.6 only when the repair also consumes precise assignment-bound attribution; its absence or failure leaves the Work intact. Classify the performer by the local system-role kind’s criterion; keep that judgment separate from the assignment.
Copy the twelve compact claims into the method.
Cite exact A7CP-* IDs only when load-bearing; keep A.7.CP as the authoritative source.