A.7.2:7 - Conformance Checklist

ID	Check
`CC-A7.2-1`	The conflict names exact receiving claims, practical consequences, contexts, scopes, and current editions.
`CC-A7.2-2`	Vocabulary difference or unlike source function alone does not trigger reconciliation.
`CC-A7.2-3`	The reader, `U.MethodDescription` episteme, described `U.Method`, actual performer identified through A.13, independently admitted dated reconciliation `U.Work`, source uses, and returned result are distinct. For a precise actual-Work claim, retain the separately declared assignment species and obtaining occurrence used by A.13; add the F.6 check only when the case must also identify the assignment under which the Work was performed. A short result may omit unused identifiers without presuming those facts.
`CC-A7.2-4`	Every load-bearing common claim is cited from `A.7.CP` through an actual reasoning-basis occurrence.
`CC-A7.2-5`	Every source-use occurrence has the three exact participants, source and receiving-claim editions, function, claim scope, and maximal continuous actual-use interval. It includes only content-slice, model-use, currentness, evidence, disposition, blocked-overread, or claim-change qualifiers actually used or asserted in this reconciliation.
`CC-A7.2-6`	Evidence, publication, formal semantics, and currentness remain with subject patterns.
`CC-A7.2-7`	The repair reopens the smallest decision set and preserves unrelated FPF decisions.
`CC-A7.2-8`	The result is one of the five declared dispositions with affected use and stop/reopen condition.
`CC-A7.2-9`	Compatibility is demonstrated rather than assumed; context split and non-composition remain valid outcomes.