A.7.CP:0 - Use this when

Use this pattern when reasoning, ontology analysis, choice, or reconciliation actually relies on a broad constructive claim and another person must be able to recover which claim, exact receiving claim or result, posture, scope, work occurrence, and interval carried that reliance.

The first useful move is to name the dated reasoning work, each exact claim-bearing result or receiving decision it is forming, the exact A7CP-* claim IDs used for that result, and whether each use is an adoptedPremise or conditionalAssumption. Leave the other compact claims latent.

Not this pattern when. Use the relevant subject pattern for citation, publication, shared vocabulary, ordinary A.7 category-error repair, source currentness, or domain/evidence questions when no compact claim is used in reasoning. No reasoning-basis occurrence obtains in that case.

The primary reader is an author or reviewer who must make one load-bearing constructive premise use recoverable. The governed object is one ClaimUsedAsReasoningBasisRelation@Context occurrence and the exact compact claim content it cites.