A.7.CP:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

Anti-pattern	Repair
Require every ontology use to check all twelve claims.	Cite only actual load-bearing claims; unused entries remain latent.
Treat a citation or work-wide claim use as a premise-use occurrence for every result.	Name the dated work, exact receiving result, and inference or comparison that actually relies on the basis claim; use separate relation occurrences for independent results.
Define “premise” and “assumption” as separate episteme kinds.	Keep one exact claim episteme and record the context-local posture.
Let the compact, a MethodDescription episteme, its described Method, a system-role kind, or an assignment perform the consuming Work or bring about its result.	Name the admitted `U.System` that performs the dated reasoning `U.Work` and retain the assignment species and obtaining occurrence used by A.13. When the claim or its receiving use expressly consumes precise assignment-bound attribution, name the obtaining F.6 attribution for that exact Work-assignment pair. State any result only through the direct result relation that the case independently establishes.
Copy the compact into `A.7`, `A.7.1`, or `A.7.2`.	Keep one authoritative source and use exact claim-ID references.
Hide evidence or currentness inside the relation.	Cite direct evidence/currentness results without turning them into relation fields.