Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:10:10 UTC
A.8:4.1 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
Anti-pattern
Why it fails
Correct action
Same-word admission
A term is admitted because many domains use the same word.
Require three domain-family projection records that show the same abstract contribution.
Prestige admission
A famous source or standard is treated as universal-core evidence by itself.
Record how the candidate is used in multiple domain families and state difference and loss.
Local success as kernel status
A local pattern works well and is therefore promoted to universal primitive.
Try dependent value, Concept-Set row, C.3 U.Kind, or direct subject-pattern value first.
False demotion by vocabulary mismatch
A universal candidate is rejected because domains use different names.
Compare abstract contribution, not spelling. After the ontic test, use F.18 for naming and F.9 only for a remaining cross-local semantic-correspondence claim.