ADM.2:4.4 - Return the usable participant account or the specific gap

The first result can be a short statement attached to the request. Name the relevant participants, the relation needed for each action, its effective conditions and the grounds that the receiving decision needs. Keep an unsupported relation claim explicit as a claim requiring resolution.

For example, “the supplied appointment establishes eligibility from 1 October; a read grant is still needed from the archive custodian” is actionable. “More approvals required” conceals the missing result and the person who can supply it.

A missing fact goes to a source or checker able to establish it. A missing grant or disputed rule application goes to the competent decision maker. If a valid condition is already met and provision failed, send the provider the authorized action and actual failure. Identification of a gap does not itself resolve it.