B.1.2:4.1 - Recover Each Direct Result Or Blocker
| Working question | Subject pattern | Exact result or stop |
|---|---|---|
| Which exact whole is being considered? | A.1 and the kind-specific recognition pattern | One exact entity recognized under the already admitted U.System kind; or the exact entity, six constructive components, kind-specific condition, and `true |
| Which constituents are parts, portions, phases, or members, and how do they assemble? | A.14, the exact part-relation specialization, and C.13 for constructive assembly grounding | Exact obtaining part-relation occurrences and the assembly they support; otherwise the missing direct governor, participant identity, obtaining fact, or assembly basis. |
| Which facts and selected boundary-use claim delimit the system for this decision? | A.1 for system identity; A.14, the exact part-relation specialization, and C.13 for parthood and assembly; every exact crossing-relation pattern for external participants; C.11 for a local choice among already available boundary readings; C.32.PAD for a post-synthesis architecture decision concerning exact project Work; C.2.1 only for a separately persistent claim | First return exact identity, obtaining parthood and assembly, and crossing facts. If those facts answer the question, stop. If the named use additionally selects a boundary reading, return the C.11 ChoiceResult or C.32.PAD ArchitectureDecisionRelation@Project that makes its inclusion, exclusion, identity-preservation, and use claim current. Another choice branch passes only after its admitted direct decision predicate, source, and result are named; otherwise return the exact missing predicate or defining pattern, participant, obtaining fact, decision governor, or information blocker. When durable reliance is needed, one separate C.2.1 episteme states that claim and cites its basis; it creates none of the world facts. A selected U.Structure remains a separate B.1.2:4.2 branch. |
| Which relation crosses the selected boundary? | The direct source, supply, flow, coupling, control, measurement, evidence, publication, transformation, commitment, or other relation pattern; F.9 only for a needed semantic correspondence or difference between two exact F.17 local senses from different semantic contexts | One exact obtaining relation occurrence with its participant bindings and direct predicate; otherwise the missing governor, endpoint, binding, or obtaining fact. |
| Which function is realized by which bearer? | The direct behavior, realization, allocation or parthood pattern; A.6.F or A.6.M only for unresolved wording; C.30.ASV only for architecture-view qualification | Recover the functional claim, admitted bearer and independently obtaining realization/allocation and parthood relations; otherwise identify the missing predicate, participant or defining source. |
| Which whole-level characteristic is claimed? | C.16, A.19, and C.29 when a mathematical lens is used | Exact bearer, characteristic, assignment or value, scale, threshold or aggregation relation, and lens-use boundary; otherwise the missing bearer, scale, relation, or evidence. |
| Which evidence, description, representation, or publication supports inspection? | A.10, B.3, C.2.1, C.29, E.17, and the exact source or architecture-description pattern | The exact episteme and exact evidence, assurance, description, representation, source-use, or publication relation; otherwise the missing identity, relation, applicability, or reliance basis. |
Naming those results together does not create a further world-side relation. Stop at the first direct blocker that prevents the named decision; do not weaken it into an aggregate-shaped placeholder.