B.1.3:2 - Problem

Naive aggregation of knowledge holons causes recurring failures:

1. Unsupported confidence folds. Averaging incomparable scores can hide conflict; a compulsory minimum can discard useful complementary support or overstate the probability of several necessary conditions. Both violate B.3 when their inputs and dependency model are unjustified.
2. Provenance erasure. Merges that drop sources, methods, or links break A.10 Evidence Graph Referring and make results unauditable.
3. Semantic drift. Folding across mismatched concepts without explicit mappings (and their CL) yields incoherent composites that look formal but mean nothing.
4. Order blindness. Arguments with essential dependency order (premise ⇒ lemma ⇒ conclusion) are treated as sets; non‑commutativity is lost and results become non‑reproducible.
5. Semantic-context chimeras. Combining claims whose local senses or reference schemes differ, without exact mappings and—when meanings cross—an F.9 Bridge plus a separately warranted bounded-use claim, silently corrupts claims and inflates R.
6. Category errors. Applying a physical quantity’s addition rule to truth, or averaging ordinal formality, ignores the value’s meaning and scale. Use C.16 for admissible scale operations and B.3 for the warranted support inference.