B.1.4:1 - Problem Frame

Many useful aggregates are not simple unordered wholes. A manufacturing sequence changes meaning when steps are swapped. An argument chain depends on which premise is used before which lemma. A turbine or another enduring individual with a stated identity rule may be considered across proper temporal restrictions. An unchanged paper or dataset episteme may also be restricted to a proper interval only while its complete C.2.1 identity triple remains fixed; changed claim content, EntityOfConcern, or effective ReferenceScheme identifies another episteme, with edition continuity tested separately. In these cases the aggregation is about order or temporal coverage over already recovered relations, not about a new level, a generic boundary, or a hidden interaction kind.

B.1.4 defines the aggregation claim. It asks which EntityOfConcern is being aggregated, which positions or phases are included, which scope and time window qualify the claim, which ordered or phase relation is being used, what the aggregate may be used for, and which neighboring pattern carries any stronger claim.